Missouri S&T researchers recommend combination of filters for homemade masks, other PPE

Posted by
On August 17, 2020

A batch of face shields, 3D printed by S&T groups, were delivered in March to Phelps Health. Professors and lab teams from the university collaborated on the project, including Dr. Yang Wang’s team working on lab testing filter materials for the masks. Photo by Tom Wagner, Missouri S&T.

A team of researchers at Missouri University of Science and Technology found that several layers of household air filters can achieve filtration performance similar to masks rated N95 – masks that capture 95% of particles. The researchers studied the filtration performance of non-medical materials and recommend making homemade face masks with a combination of fibrous and fabric materials. They say the materials will sufficiently remove aerosols and avoid the inhalation of fiber fragments generated during the cutting and folding of the filters.

“As a core component of the face mask and respirator, the filter materials need to achieve a high efficiency in particle removal and a low flow resistance to ensure breathability,” says Dr. Yang Wang, assistant professor of environmental engineering at Missouri S&T. “Our research looked at vacuum bags, coffee filters, activated carbon filters and various types of fabrics.”

With the shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) due to COVID-19, people have turned to substituting homemade masks to protect people from the coronavirus’s spread through droplets and aerosols. While droplets can be removed through the fabrics in homemade masks, little research had previously been done related to their filtration performance.

The Missouri S&T research team found that fibrous filters, such as vacuum and coffee filters, can achieve a filtration efficiency and flow resistance similar to that of N95-rated mask materials. They also found that fabrics, such as a scarf, bandana or pillowcases are less inefficient for collecting aerosols.

“It was hypothesized that the performance of household fabrics would not compare to the filter materials used in commercial medical filters,” says Wang. “But while evaluating four types of medical materials and thirteen types of non-medical materials, we found that fibrous filters, such as household air filters, can achieve a filtration efficiency and flow resistance similar to that of N95 mask materials.”

The research team also observed a positive relationship between the thread count of the fabrics and filtration efficiency. They concluded that the difference between the fibrous and fabric materials is that fibrous materials could further remove aerosols with electrostatic mechanisms, which allows an adequate removal of aerosols.

The team initially found that few existing studies comprehensively assessed the effectiveness of non-medical materials in particle filtration, which has led to current uncertainties when deciding what the public should use in homemade PPE.

According to Wang, dedicated filters such as medical masks use electrostatic interactions to filter particles in addition to the general mechanisms of impaction, interception and the movement of particles in fluid called Brownian diffusion. On the other hand, household fabrics mainly rely on the low permeability of the materials to collect aerosols.

The overall filtration efficiency of a filter is calculated by dividing the concentration of particles collected by that of total particles. Based on that, the researchers initially believed a filter’s overall efficiency may depend on the amount of aerosols and not particles’ different sizes. However, as COVID-19 may be carried by aerosols of various sizes, the size-dependent filtration efficiency of the filter materials had to be carefully examined.

The research, titled “Filtration performances of non-medical materials as candidates for manufacturing face masks and respirators,” was published in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health Vol. 229 in August 2020. The Missouri S&T research team consists of Wang, his graduate student Weixing Hao, Dr. Joel Burken, chair and professor of civil, architectural and environmental engineering at S&T, and Dr. Hongyan Ma, assistant professor of environmental engineering at S&T.

About Missouri University of Science and Technology

Founded in 1870 as the University of Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, Missouri University of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T) is a STEM-focused research university of over 8,000 students and part of the four-campus University of Missouri System. Located in Rolla, Missouri, Missouri S&T offers 99 different degree programs in 40 areas of study, including engineering, the sciences, business and information technology, education, the humanities, and the liberal arts. Missouri S&T is known globally and is highly ranked for providing a high return on tuition investment, exceptional career opportunities for graduates, and an emphasis on applied, hands-on learning through student design teams and cooperative education and internship opportunities. For more information about Missouri S&T, visit www.mst.edu.

Share this page

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

One thought on “Missouri S&T researchers recommend combination of filters for homemade masks, other PPE”

  • Ken Rapplean says:

    That is great. But what layering of materials, filters etc. could be used by a sewer at home?? My wife and quilt group makes 100’s of masks. From Ken Rapplean/Geol.Eng/1974/26.5 years with Reg. 7 EPA